This walkthrough builds an Iris flower classifier one part at a time. It demonstrates multiclass classification: predicting one class from three or more possible categories.
Problem: Identify an Iris flower as Setosa, Versicolor, or Virginica from four measurements.
Dataset: 150 flowers with four numerical features and three one-hot encoded target columns.
| ML task | Multiclass classification |
| Level | Beginner |
| Dataset | 150 Iris flower records |
| Inputs | Four numerical flower measurements |
| Target | One of three Iris species, represented by one-hot columns |
| Model | 4 -> 16 -> 3 feed-forward neural network with a Softmax output |
| Default training | Up to 350 CPU epochs, with an error-based stop condition |
| Related concepts | Machine Learning Basics, Neural Networks, Backpropagation, Deep Netts API, Model Development |
The model receives four flower measurements:
sepal_length, sepal_width, petal_length, petal_width
and predicts one of three species:
SETOSA, VERSICOLOR, VIRGINICA
The complete flow is:
load -> inspect -> split -> scale -> build -> train -> evaluate -> save -> predict
Set the dataset path, model path, and expected shape:
private static final String DATASET_PATH =
"src/main/resources/datasets/iris-flowers.csv";
private static final String MODEL_PATH =
"models/iris-multiclass-classifier.dnet";
private static final int NUM_INPUTS = 4;
private static final int NUM_OUTPUTS = 3;
Four inputs describe a flower. Three outputs represent the three possible species.
Define names in the same order as the target columns:
private static final String[] CLASS_NAMES = {
"SETOSA", "VERSICOLOR", "VIRGINICA"
};
Index 0 maps to Setosa, index 1 to Versicolor, and index 2 to Virginica. This order must stay aligned with the CSV header.
Verify Java and select deterministic CPU execution:
verifyJavaRuntime();
DeepNetts.getInstance().setUseCuda(false);
DeepNetts.getInstance().setMaxThreads(1);
Output:
WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.vector
The example requires Java 25 with the Vector API enabled. CPU execution keeps the project easy to run without CUDA, and one worker thread makes results easier to reproduce.
Read four input columns and three output columns:
TabularDataSet<MLDataItem> dataSet =
DataSets.readCsv(
DATASET_PATH,
NUM_INPUTS,
NUM_OUTPUTS,
true,
","
);
The three target columns are one-hot encoded. A Setosa row ends with 1,0,0, while the other species activate a different target column.
Print the number of samples and parsed column names:
System.out.println("Samples: " + dataSet.size());
System.out.println(
"Columns: " + Arrays.toString(dataSet.getColumnNames())
);
Output:
Samples: 150 Columns: [sepal_length, sepal_width, petal_length, petal_width, setosa, versicolor, virginica]
The expected result is 150 samples and seven columns: four inputs followed by three targets.
Shuffle reproducibly, then reserve test samples:
dataSet.shuffle(42);
TrainTestSplit split = dataSet.trainTestSplit(0.8);
DataSet<MLDataItem> trainingSet = split.getTrainingSet();
DataSet<MLDataItem> testSet = split.getTestSet();
The network learns only from the training set. The test set measures how it handles unseen flowers.
Fit Min-Max scaling on training data and reuse it for testing:
MinMaxScaler scaler = DataSets.scaleToMinMax(trainingSet);
scaler.apply(testSet);
All four features are measured in centimeters but use different ranges. Fitting the scaler only on training data prevents data leakage.
Create the 4 -> 16 -> 3 architecture:
FeedForwardNetwork neuralNet = FeedForwardNetwork.builder()
.addInputLayer(NUM_INPUTS)
.addFullyConnectedLayer(16, ActivationType.TANH)
.addOutputLayer(NUM_OUTPUTS, ActivationType.SOFTMAX)
.lossFunction(LossType.CROSS_ENTROPY)
.randomSeed(42)
.build();
The hidden layer learns non-linear relationships between flower measurements. Softmax produces three comparable probabilities, and Cross-Entropy trains them against the one-hot targets.
Configure the trainer and start learning:
neuralNet.getTrainer()
.setStopError(0.03f)
.setStopEpochs(350)
.setLearningRate(0.001f)
.setOptimizer(OptimizerType.ADAM);
neuralNet.train(trainingSet);
Output:
TRAINING NEURAL NETWORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Initial Train Error:1.0736417 Epoch:1, Time:10ms, TrainError:1.0048019, TrainErrorChange:-0.06883979, TrainAccuracy:0.41945544 Epoch:2, Time:3ms, TrainError:0.9104093, TrainErrorChange:-0.0943926, TrainAccuracy:0.53105694 Epoch:3, Time:2ms, TrainError:0.8589118, TrainErrorChange:-0.05149746, TrainAccuracy:0.54152936 ... Epoch:350, Time:1ms, TrainError:0.04522642, TrainErrorChange:-3.0234456E-5, TrainAccuracy:0.9670732 TRAINING COMPLETED Total Training Time: 320ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADAM adapts parameter updates during training. The middle epochs are omitted for readability. This run reached the 350-epoch limit, reducing training error from about 1.07 to 0.045 and reaching about 96.7% training accuracy.
Measure performance on the test set:
ClassificationMetrics metrics = (ClassificationMetrics) neuralNet.test(testSet);
System.out.println(metrics);
Output:
Class: Macro Average Total items: 32 True positive:26.0 Number of examples correctly classified as positive True negative:0.0 Number of examples correctly classified as negative False positive:3.0 Number of examples incorrectly classified as positive False negative:3.0 Number of examples incorrectly classified as negative Accuracy (ACC): 0.8125 How often is a classifier correct in total (percent of correct classifications) Precision (PPV): 0.8965517 How often is a classifier correct when it gives positive prediction Recall: 0.8965517 When it is actually positive class, how often does it give positive prediction F1 Score: 0.8965517 Harmonic average (balance) of precision and recall Specificity (TNR): 0.0 When it is actually negative class, how often does it give negative prediction Fall-out (FPR): 1.0 How often it gives false positive prediction in total (percent of false positive predictions) False negative rate (FNR): 0.10344828 How often it gives false negative prediction in total (percent of false negative predictions)
These are macro-averaged multiclass metrics over 32 held-out flowers. Accuracy shows the overall result, while precision, recall, F1, and the error counts describe performance across the three classes.
Attach preprocessing before saving:
neuralNet.setNormalizer(scaler);
Files.createDirectories(Path.of("models"));
neuralNet.save(MODEL_PATH);
The saved model retains the same scaling required for future raw flower measurements.
Describe a new flower, run inference, and select the largest Softmax probability:
float[] flower = {
5.1f,
3.5f,
1.4f,
0.2f
};
float[] probabilities = neuralNet.predict(flower);
int predictedClass = indexOfLargest(probabilities);
System.out.println("Class probabilities: " + Arrays.toString(probabilities));
System.out.println("Predicted species: " + CLASS_NAMES[predictedClass]);
Output:
Class probabilities: [0.99999917, 8.8696953E-7, 1.34597316E-17] Predicted species: SETOSA
The values follow the CLASS_NAMES order. indexOfLargest performs
argmax, selecting the first probability and producing SETOSA.
Pass this option to the Java process through your IDE's application run configuration or the command line:
--add-modules=jdk.incubator.vector
You assembled a complete multiclass pipeline:
One-hot Iris CSV
|
v
80/20 train/test split
|
v
Min-Max scaling
|
v
4 -> 16 -> 3 Softmax network
|
v
Classification evaluation
|
v
Saved model and species prediction
The target has three mutually exclusive species, so Softmax returns a normalized probability for each species.
Each output position corresponds to one species label; changing that order would attach probabilities to the wrong names.
Was this helpful?
Thank you!